If you have a scientific interest, you may have reflected upon the similarity between a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and an electron beam powder bed fusion (E-PBF) machine.
An SEM is composed of an electron gun and a high vacuum chamber. The electron gun scans an e-beam over a specimen, and high resolution images are generated by measuring secondary or backscattered electrons from the specimen. Alternatively, chemical images are generated by measuring characteristic X-rays from the specimen.
E-PBF also employs an electron gun and a high vacuum chamber. An e-beam is scanned over a powder bed to preheat and melt powder into solid material.
Does this mean that an E-PBF machine can be used to create electron images, just like an SEM? Yes indeed! The E-PBF process generates lots of backscattered electrons (and X-rays) from the powder bed. Such signals can easily be converted into images.
To my knowledge, electron imaging is not yet available for commercial E-PBF systems, but there is a lot of R&D going on. Teams at University of Liverpool (UK), University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (Germany) and North Carolina State University (US) have independently demonstrated successful electron imaging for E-PBF in-situ process monitoring. I can recommend a number of scientific papers on this topic, in case you are interested.
Ulf Ackelid, Ph.D.
Senior Scientist and Co-Founder
I have a PhD in applied physics and 25 years of industrial experience. Since 2002, I am working with additive manufacturing (AM) of metals with focus on electron beam technology. I have specialized in materials and process development for AM, and I have also contributed with several innovations and patents in this field. I am primarily an experimentalist who loves practical problem solving and hands-on laboratory work. Even though I have been working for industrial companies for a long time, a piece of my heart and soul is still devoted to academic R&D.
You may also like
EBM, SEBM, EBAM, EBSM, E-PBF, EB-FFF,… different acronyms for similar things